Work & Productivity Profiler

Your leadership team agrees less than you think

Each senior leader weights and ranks the capabilities the organisation most needs. We total the weighted votes onto one dashboard, then measure how united the team really is.

Leadership priorities, by total weighted vote

Six leaders · 100 points each · 600 points shared across eight capabilities

Illustrative

Agreement (Kendall’s W)

Weak agreement

Weak agreement — the team shares a top concern but pulls apart over what comes next.

A score near 1 means the leaders rank the priorities almost identically; a score near 0 means they rank them all over the place. At 0.22 the room broadly agrees Productivity comes first, then scatters. Worth knowing on day one: a strategy built on an assumed consensus that is not there tends to stall later, when the trade-offs get real.

Opinion splits most on Brand & culture and Sustainability — some leaders rank them near the top, others near the bottom.

Illustrative dashboard. Leaders shown by role only. Kendall’s W = 0.22 (0 = no agreement, 1 = full agreement).

Illustrative leadership-priorities dashboard: total weighted vote per organisational capability, ranked high to low, with the most divided capabilities flagged. Six leaders each allocate 100 points.
Rank	Capability	Total weighted vote (of 600)	CEO	CFO	CHRO	COO	CIO	CMO	Agreement
Kendall’s W agreement measure = 0.22 on a 0 to 1 scale (0 = no agreement, 1 = full agreement). Weak agreement: the team shares a top concern, Productivity, but pulls apart over what comes next. Opinion splits most on Brand and culture and Sustainability.