Your leadership team agrees less than you think

Leadership priorities, by total weighted vote

Six leaders · 100 points each · 600 points shared across eight capabilities
Illustrative

Agreement (Kendall’s W)

Weak agreement

Weak agreement: Productivity tops the combined vote, but each of the six leaders puts a different capability first.

A score near 1 means the leaders rank the priorities almost identically; a score near 0 means they rank them all over the place. At 0.22 the leaders agree on little: Productivity wins the combined vote, but no two leaders share a first choice.

Opinion splits most on Brand & culture and Sustainability. The CMO ranks them near the top, most other leaders near the bottom.

Illustrative dashboard. Leaders shown by role only. Kendall’s W = 0.22 (0 = no agreement, 1 = full agreement).
Illustrative leadership-priorities dashboard: total weighted vote per organisational capability, ranked high to low, with the most divided capabilities flagged. Six leaders each allocate 100 points.
Rank Capability Total weighted vote (of 600) CEO CFO CHRO COO CIO CMO How divided
Kendall’s W agreement measure = 0.22 on a 0 to 1 scale (0 = no agreement, 1 = full agreement). Weak agreement: Productivity tops the combined vote, but each of the six leaders puts a different capability first. Opinion splits most on Brand and culture and Sustainability.